International Relation in Asian Economies-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the International relation and Global economy. Answer: Introduction: A remarkable record of sustained and high economic growth was witnessed in East Asian economies and compared to all region of world, twenty East Asias economies, the growth rate was faster. Getting basic rights was the main reason behind high growth achievement and the principle engines of growth comprised of rapidly growing human capital and private domestic investment. High level of investments in the economies was sustained by high level of domestic financial savings. Compared to other developing world, East Asian economies witnessed declining growth in population rate (Burchill et al. 2013). The major ingredient of rapid economic growth was fundamentally sound development policy. Essential framework of private investment was provided by unusually stable macro-economic performance and macroeconomic management. World Bank in its report of East Asian miracle 1993, describes the policies associated with rapid growth by expanding in neoclassical views. This has provided with systemati c clarification how carefully limited and effective government activism has helped developing countries in experiencing rapid growth. It has been argued by neo classical adherents that low relative price distortions was mainly because of absence of distortionary and price control policies and orientation of these economies towards international trade (Baylis et al. 2017). Discussion: The public policies of eight high performing economies is examined in the World Bank report for year 1965 to 1990. Report helps in uncovering the role of policies that helped in improving human welfare, economic growth and equitable distribution of income in Japan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Republic of Korea, Thailand and Taiwan. Sound policies development helped in stabilization of high performing Asian economies that led to high growth. The more equitable distribution of income within these economies has enabled to maintain commitment to share new prosperity. It has been depicted by report that rapid accumulation of capital was promoted by public policies by encouraging high level of domestic savings and making banks more reliable. These Asian economies increased their skilled labor force by providing better primary and secondary education and universal primary schooling. Success of these high performing economies was attributable to several factors such as regulat ory and legal structures, welcoming of new technology, and policies of agriculture boosting productivity. Rapid development in economies of these countries was mainly because of targeting of key industries (Navaretti and Tarr 2017). Management of resources allocation was strictly done in key areas. Marketing institutions established by government helped in promoting trade in manufacturing exports. Effectiveness of such interventions by government is argued by analyst. However, they agree to the fact that the expansion would have not been sustainable and dramatic in the absence of development and stability of physical and human capital and macroeconomic stability foundation. As per the report, macroeconomic stability within these economies was created because of their basic developmental policies. Report depicts that reasons why changing global economy does not require government interventions (Jackson and Srensen 2015). World Bank Report articulates market friendly strategy by describing the appropriate government role is to ensure making adequate investment in people, keeping the economy open to international trade, providing climate for private enterprise and thereby helps in maintaining stable macro economy. It has been argued by the report that unless government intervention in market is friendly, they are more likely to do harm than good. The exhaustive view for the last thirty years about developing economies depicts that attempts to allocate resources with non-market mechanisms have not been able to improve economic performance (Nye and Welch 2016). The growth of High East Asian economies can be explained by using a framework that explain about potential mixes of public policies across economies. Elements of understanding the success such economies can be explained by broadly viewing the relationship between rapid growth and public policy that can be understood by using a functional approach. Three central functions of allocation, accumulation and growth in productivity can be achieved by contribution from policy. Basis of rapid growth in the East Asian economies were because of fundamentals of market oriented policies (Gilpin 2016). The potential to contribute to growth for addressing economic coordination problems were driven by interventionist policies. Successful implementation and definition of policies was mainly because of institutions and this helps in supporting competitive discipline at high level. This can be explained with the help of an instance, improved allocation though reduction of instability in level of price and vigorous accumulation through investment rate were mainly attributable to macroeconomic management. Level of financial savings and high productivity investments increased due to secure and effective financial system. Superior accumulation of East Asian economies was relatively because of equal distribution of income and rapid growth (Duffield 2014). The success of Asia economies can be attributed to number of factors as explained in the report presented by World Band and they are as follows: Export growth and achieving macroeconomic stability- Macroeconomic management was the characteristics of high performing Asian economies. Fiscal deficit was limited to the extent that they could be easily financed by responding quickly to fiscal pressures and without increasing inflationary pressures. The terms of trade shocks was adjusted quickly by the macroeconomic policies compared to low and middle economies. Rapid growth in export was contributed by such stability and reduction in expenditures was made by policies of adjusting exchange rate. Export was promoted by variety of approaches such as duty free imports for exporters, tax incentives export credit and export target. Development of export was based on foreign direct investment and broadly based incentives (Deresky 2017). Building institutional basis for growth-The political regime of East Asia was described as developmental states that leads to the intervention and devising of well honored interventions. The principle of shared growth was established by East Asian leaders that all groups in economy would be benefitted due to expansion. Share of future wealth was demonstrated by explicit mechanisms. A business friendly environment was built by leaders in high performing economies. Private investment received hospitality from regulatory and legal structure. Deliberation council was established by some economy such as Korea, Japan, Singapore and Malaysia. Information exchange was facilitated between government, private sector, firms and management with the help of deliberation council (Hollifield et al. 2014). Accumulating physical and human capital- A combination of interventionist and fundamental policies was used by East Asian economies for achieving rapid accumulation of physical and human resources. Some intervention policies involves state capitalism, mild repression of interest rate, risk socialization and mandatory saving mechanisms. Fundamental policies involves government obligations such as education, adequate infrastructure, securing financial institutions and education. Equitable distribution of income was contributed by education policies of these economies. Low inequality was reinforced by educational expansion. Such policies helped in increasing savings and investment within economy. Volatility of higher interest rates on deposits was ensured by avoiding inflation and compared to other developing countries, higher interest rates on deposits in the financial system was offered by high performing Asian economies (Mundy and Verger 2015). Productivity change and efficient allocation- Allocation of resources could have been adversely affected by policies favoring accumulation in Asian economies including socialization, financial repression and risk bounding. Important aspects of success of East Asia was captured by market friendly approach and these economies are characterized by high share of international trade in gross domestic product, micro economically stable, strong competition among firms and investing heavily in people. There are different policy instruments and allocation of resources among private sector is guided by extensive intervention of government in market. Export push strategy as a part of encouraging growth of rapid manufactured exports has resulted in several benefits (Stubbs 2017). Some of the benefits involve increase foreign technology acquisition, rapid growth in productivity and efficient allocation. The urban wages were closed to supply price of labor because of income growth and higher produ ctivity in agriculture. The income of rural and urban labor possessing similar skills have witnessed a rough increase. Credit allocation in these economy was influenced by creation of financial institutions, improving selection of private banks by regulation enforcement and using public and private banks to direct credit to specific firms (Neilson et al. 2014). The careful interventions of policies have benefitted in terms of rapid growth experienced by Japan and most of East Asian economies. Several cost were incurred due to such interventions and such cost were held by high East Asian economies government within defined limits. In light of these, explicit subsidies and international interest rates were fiscally manageable sounds. Government quickly abandons and modifies such intervention if it poses threat to economic stability (Preston and Windsor 2013). Informal economic linkages have benefitted East Asian economies by encouraging flows of investment and trade. The world economic system was emerged due to integration of Asian ports due to trade expansion and European military. Stage of rapid growth of East Asian economies was set from assistance of US in rebuilding Japan after World War II followed by military spending and massive economic assistance by US. A substantial boost was received by Japanese industry from provisioning of US troops in Korea. This is so because some of conglomerates in Korea initiated selling services and goods in during war in Vietnam to US military (Guttmann 2016). The adoption of imitative strategies is facilitated by regional linkages in activities of both private and public sector. A model of potential instruments for growth was provided by impressed policy makers of East Asia. The flow of capital was facilitated by geographical proximity in an attempt to take advantage of lower wage by mobility of factories of labor extensive exports of North Asian manufacturers. The dynamism of Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia received significant contribution from investment surge flowing from countries such as Japan, Korea, Hong Kong and Korea and Taiwan (O'brien and Williams 2016). The liberal treatment of foreign investment have helped in encouraging these linkages. Investors have received assistance in relatively free movement of capital from information network and informal credit. Positive regional externalities have benefitted East Asian economies in addition to imitation and direct linkages. Networks were established for sourcing the products of East Asian economies by trading with Western importers and Japan. East Asian producers had the rare opportunities to enter international market by imposing quantitative restrictions on Japanese products (O'brien and Williams 2016). Pragmatic flexibility is one of the assurances of economic policy making in high performing East Asian economies. The policies instrument of government was tied in pursuits of economic developments. In light of these, failed instruments were abandoned and instruments that worker were retained. Thus, when the macroeconomic stability of Korea and Malaysia was threatened, government took measures to reduce the promotion of chemical and heavy industries (Buzan and Lawson 2013). Conclusion: The search for explaining the policies leading to success of East Asian economies and the growth in these economies can be contributed by the potentiality of more interventionist policies. In order to achieve success and addressing of coordination problems can be done by combining the cooperation benefits and contest creation. There are two set of factors on which effective implementation of contests depends. First is flexibility and pragmatism of high performing Asian economies government and the second is insulation, competence and relative deficiency of corruptibility of public administration in Korea and Japan. References list: Baylis, J., Owens, P. and Smith, S. eds., 2017.The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press. Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C. and True, J., 2013.Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan. Buzan, B. and Lawson, G., 2013. The global transformation: The nineteenth century and the making of modern international relations.International Studies Quarterly,57(3), pp.620-634. Buzan, B. and Lawson, G., 2015.The global transformation: history, modernity and the making of international relations(Vol. 135). Cambridge University Press. Deresky, H., 2017.International management: Managing across borders and cultures. Pearson Education India. Duffield, M., 2014.Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. Zed Books Ltd.. Gilpin, R., 2016.The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press. Guttmann, R., 2016.How Credit-money Shapes the Economy: The United States in a Global System: The United States in a Global System. Routledge. Guzzini, S., 2013.Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: the continuing story of a death foretold. Routledge. Hollifield, J., Martin, P. and Orrenius, P., 2014.Controlling immigration: A global perspective. Stanford University Press. Jackson, R. and Srensen, G., 2015.Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford university press. Kublkov, V., 2015.International relations in a constructed world. Routledge. Mundy, K. and Verger, A., 2015. The World Bank and the global governance of education in a changing world order.International Journal of Educational Development,40, pp.9-18. Navaretti, G.B. and Tarr, D.G., 2017. International knowledge flows and economic performance: A review of the evidence. InTrade Policies for Development and Transition(pp. 129-143). Neilson, J., Pritchard, B. and Yeung, H.W.C., 2014. Global value chains and global production networks in the changing international political economy: An introduction.Review of International Political Economy,21(1), pp.1-8. Nye Jr, J.S. and Welch, D.A., 2016.Understanding global conflict and cooperation: an introduction to theory and history. Pearson. O'brien, R. and Williams, M., 2016.Global political economy: Evolution and dynamics. Palgrave Macmillan. Preston, L.E. and Windsor, D., 2013.The rules of the game in the global economy: Policy regimes for international business. Springer Science Business Media. Stubbs, R., 2017.Rethinking Asia's economic miracle: The political economy of war, prosperity and crisis. Palgrave.